Place Studies

Suckerfish

  • Travel Studies
  • Classes
    • Art of Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • The Travel Habit
    • Archive
  • Studies Abroad
    • Berlin
    • Buenos Aires
    • Florence
    • Ghana
    • London
    • Madrid
    • Paris
    • Prague
    • Shanghai
    • Links & Other Sites
      • Study Abroad Resources
      • Brazil
      • Cuba
      • IHP: Tanzania-Vietnam
      • Venezuela
  • Research
  • A-V
    • A-V materials
    • Place TV
    • Node locations
    • Slideshows
  • Academics
    • Registration
    • Internships
    • Gallatin links
    • NYU Links
  • Life
    • Gallatin events
    • Announcements
    • Events Calendar
    • Places to go
  • News
    • Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • Travel in the Thirties
    • Travel Classics
    • Travel Literature
    • A Sense of Place
    • Maps
    • NYC
    • Noted New York
    • Noted News
    • Book News
    • Home
    • Search
    • Help
    • Log in

Blogs (Fall 2009)

  • All Blogs
  • Art of Travel
  • Travel Fictions
  • The Travel Habit

Recent Posts

Epiphany in Venice
The Real Lesson is in the Journey
Stranger Danger
The Other Side of the Ocean
Travel Experience and Epiphany

Recent Comments

Would you really want
Packing
I think there may be a logic
I agree with you. I think
i think i actually saw more
Looking back on our arrivals

Blogs

for art's sake!

Submitted by kass on Mon, 02/09/2009 - 22:27
  • Art of Travel Sp 09
  • 4. Open Topic

it was too cold to take photos of the grand palaisit was too cold to take photos of the grand palais

There's been an exhibition (be forewarned when using that word in French; it means a stripshow) at the Grand Palais on Picasso and the Old Masters. They've borrowed a very bewildering array of works by Picasso, Velaquez, Ingres, Manet, El Greco, plus a host of others from other museums, and set them up jusxtaposed to one another: Picasso’s works, and those that inspired him. Not only does it cut out an enormous cross-section of art history, this is supposedly the most expensive exhibition in the world, simply because each individual piece is worth so much.

 

But enough background. I'd been meaning to go to the exhibition months before I got to Paris. A couple of friends and I toyed with the idea of venturing out on the first day, but we got lost and went to the Louvre instead, and got our student cards (free entry!). In the following weeks I've had a mad rush of settling in and school, with absolutely no time to wander around a museum. Now, as of the time this is written, the exhibition ends tomorrow and under normal circumstances, the tickets have been utterly sold out and admissions impossible. However, in response to the overwhelming attention, the Grand Palais decided to extend the show. Not with more days, but by opening it 24/7, like a mini Nuit Blanche.

 

Of course, being young silly college students, we went (else this entry would be dedicated to something else entirely). Unanimously clamouring at the idea of a night at the museum, we meticulously planned to go only at 1.45am, after the metro closed. Lack of transport, we thought, would greatly reduce the crowd while we camped out at Brioche Dorée – a café chain – on the nearby Champs Elysée. By the time we trekked down to Grand Palais in the freezing cold (and losing our way in the process), the sign at the end of the queue prophesized a 3 hour wait. Aaaaand we waited. In the cold. Nearly subzero. By the time we finally got inside, my toes were so cold they were alternately numb and bitingly painful, my hands were icy, and we kept huddling while jumping up and down in a very pathetic (and failed) attempt to keep warm.

 

But we did it! At 3.15, we were finally done with queuing (the last half an hour of it was indoors, thankfully) and sat at the cafe to defrost. By the time we left at 5.45, the line was at the same length, the many rooms still equally crowded, and more people arriving because the metro was open. The things we do for art.

 

P.S About the exhibition itself (which seems so trivial compared to our ordeal): 'twas interesting, particularly because they had Picasso's earlier and other styles of work apart from cubism. Personally, I'm actually not very fond of cubism - I don't really like anything more modern that Cézanne, Manet, Ingres, Monet & Co. - but Picasso's sanguine and charcoal sketches are astounding. I liked his line work too, and there was one with just straight lines that conveyed pure outline and nothing else, yet it captured so much of the female form, expression and attitude of his subject. On the other hand, colours make his work more child-like, like the four of Picasso's responses to Les Maniéres, none of which measured up to the absent original.

  • kass's blog

Hey, I am glad you got to go.

Submitted by valentina on Tue, 02/10/2009 - 13:47.

Hey, I am glad you got to go. I don't know if you were here last semester but in our art history class we got to write about it. What I thought was most interesting was how Picasso enters another artist's work and breaks down the space and the forms. Cubism is hard to understand and it can be not so pleasing for some but it is a completely new way of approaching space and volume. In fact, Cezanne was the 'pere' of cubism since he was started to represent volume and forms through geometrical forms. Picasso takes this further and in his his work based on other artists, he plays with their characters and questions their role in the paintings. If you are interested, you should buy the art magazines in any magazine stand with reviews about different shows. That way, it is more interesting to look at the exhibitions.

Contact * About Place Studies * RSS

Powered by Drupal * Site Map * Course Archive

User Agreement * Privacy * Comment Policy

Copyright © 2008 PlaceStudies.com


RoopleTheme