Blogs
The Flat Earth Theory
It’s almost baffling that Christopher Columbus is as respected as he is and regarded as such a hero when this book makes him seem like a lying, manipulative, murdering colonizer. So I watched this silly little movie to try to figure it, and this is what I came up with: Christopher Columbus is considered a hero because he is a seen as a brave, ambitious man who dared to question accepted science and set out to prove that, despite popular belief, the world was actually round. This is understandable—people like brave and courageous, they like people who think for themselves, they like people who take risks that pay off (Columbus did, after all, prove that the world did not just end with the oceans falling off into space). Unfortunately, it is also very wrong. No educated Westerner believed the world was flat after the 3rd century BC, but when Washington Irving wrote a highly fictionalized fantasy story about Columbus’ life, it became accepted that the Flat Earth theory was way more widely believed that it ever was.
The Flat Earth theory can be found in Mesopotamian writings, the Bible, and ancient Babylonian, Greek, and pre-17th century Chinese cultures. But as early as the 6th century BC, scientists and mathematicians like Pythagoras began to question this theory. Aristotle is said to have disproved the theory in 330 BC, and after that, westerners pretty much accepted that the world was round. In the 1800s, Camille Flammarion’s woodcut L'Atmosphère: Météorologie Populaire depicted a man hanging over the edge of the world where the Earth meets Heaven. Although he was only illustrating a scene from the bible in the style of a 16th century woodcut, many people came to believe that the woodcut was actually from the 1500s, and actually depicted what people believed about the shape of the world. From this, Washington Irving got the idea to incorporate the Flat Earth theory into his Columbus biography, which was largely mistaken as true.


Columbus was kind of a prick, wasn't he?
I TOTALLY agree with your sentiments about Columbus' questionable "hero" status; I mean, he was undeniably significant, but this case definitely calls to mind the complete overuse of that appellation "hero". Who can it even apply to nowadays? Or in history, for that matter? It seems to be such a subjective term any way you slice it; "heros" have caused massive chaos, been the figureheads of such incredible social and moral calamity, such as our friend Columbus here. Is there any real way to define what a hero should be? Either way, the cementlng of that classification would certainly be complicated.
It is amazing how prevalent
It is amazing how prevalent the flat earth theory is given how it has been proven false. I think grade school teachers are partly to blame, as I know I was definitely taught as a little kid that Columbus was the first person to prove the world was not flat. I also think it is simplifying things to call Columbus evil or a villian, as you pointed out. You have to look at someone's actions in the context of their times and I don't think it is clear cut that Columbus was pure evil.
The flat earth theory really
The flat earth theory really is quite a controversy! I definitely thought that disproving it was Columbus’ key intention over pillaging the Caribbean for all that it was worth and leaving an inerasable footprint (or stomp, rather) on it forever. I commend you for seeking to find the good in the now commonly vilified “founder” of our continent. I also really enjoyed the video link you posted. I’m pretty sure that I saw that at some point during my primary school education.