Blogs
"I Came Here Because I Wanted to Write a Novel"
TangierIn his review of the Paul Bowles’ novel The Sheltering Sky, playwright Tennessee Williams said of the lead character Port that “he is a member of the New York intelligentsia who became weary of being such a member and set out to escape it in remote places. Escape it he certainly does. He escapes practically all the appurtenances of civilized modern life. Balanced between fascination and dread, he goes deeper and deeper into this dreamlike ‘awayness.’”
Williams was comparing Port to Bowles himself. Bowles spent a deal of time in Gertrude Stein’s artistic circle of friends in France before going to Tangier in 1931 on her advice. When he moved permanently 16 years later, he said, “I came here because I wanted to write a novel.”
And write one he did. The terse prose, the unfortunate fate of the two main characters, and the lively and varied supporting cast all bolster The Sheltering Sky. And though Bowles didn’t actually meet the end that his literary stand-in Port did, there is still plenty to be garnered about travel fiction and reality from the parallel between author and subject.
Port, and by extension Bowles, says that, “he did not think of himself as a tourist; he was a traveler. The difference is partly one of time.” If we deem one who spends a small amount of time in another area and then returning to an area of comfort then Bowles has no chance of being mistaken for a tourist. His was essentially a relocation if anything.
But in our continued debate on what differentiates the traveller from the tourist, is there going to be a cut and dry solution? Obviously not, but then why not look at other options as well, such as the settler in this case. At the very least, it is relieving that the novel itself outwardly contemplates this question instead of leaving us to debate it on our own.


Settler-ing Sky?
Interesting... After finishing the novel, I would say this debate of tourist vs. traveler vs. settler has absolutely nothing to do with time as Port might suggest, but instead is solely based on mentality. Port is a traveler because he has no sense of belonging. He travels through the Sahara, with no destination and no place to return to. He says he hates America, and therefore would probably not consider it home. In contrast, a tourist is someone who has a home, and intends to return to it at the end of their travels. In Daisy Miller, the Millers were tourists. They had every intention of returning to America, even if they didn't know the exact date of their return. As for the settler, that is someone who travels to a place and plans to stay there, with no intentions of ever returning to the place they came from. I'm not sure we've truly come across one yet...
I would say Bowles, like Port, is a traveler, because the sense I got from the documentary was that he did not consider Tangeir his home. He stayed there because it wasn't America, but was increasingly unsatisfied as he left his apartment. He wouldn't say he was a local, and if someone had suggested another location to him, he probably would've taken off and left, just as Port continued to do until his demise.