Place Studies

Suckerfish

  • Travel Studies
  • Classes
    • Art of Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • The Travel Habit
    • Archive
  • Studies Abroad
    • Berlin
    • Buenos Aires
    • Florence
    • Ghana
    • London
    • Madrid
    • Paris
    • Prague
    • Shanghai
    • Links & Other Sites
      • Study Abroad Resources
      • Brazil
      • Cuba
      • IHP: Tanzania-Vietnam
      • Venezuela
  • Research
  • A-V
    • A-V materials
    • Place TV
    • Node locations
    • Slideshows
  • Academics
    • Registration
    • Internships
    • Gallatin links
    • NYU Links
  • Life
    • Gallatin events
    • Announcements
    • Events Calendar
    • Places to go
  • News
    • Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • Travel in the Thirties
    • Travel Classics
    • Travel Literature
    • A Sense of Place
    • Maps
    • NYC
    • Noted New York
    • Noted News
    • Book News
    • Home
    • Search
    • Help
    • Log in

Blogs (Fall 2009)

  • All Blogs
  • Art of Travel
  • Travel Fictions
  • The Travel Habit

Recent Posts

Epiphany in Venice
The Real Lesson is in the Journey
Stranger Danger
The Other Side of the Ocean
Travel Experience and Epiphany

Recent Comments

Would you really want
Packing
I think there may be a logic
I agree with you. I think
i think i actually saw more
Looking back on our arrivals

Blogs

The "Heart" of the Desert

Submitted by lemon-basil on Mon, 10/12/2009 - 09:42
  • Travel Fictions
  • Sheltering Sky
  • Algeria
  • Sahara Desert
  • symbolism

The "Heart" of the DesertThe "Heart" of the Desert

The “Heart” of the Desert Paul Bowle’s The Sheltering Sky follows American married couple Port and Kit and their friend Tunner on their travels through Algeria in the Sahara desert. As the three travelers move deeper into the desert, the towns get progressively more rustic, dirty, diseased and dangerous. This downward spiral of travel symbolizes the deteriorating of the travelers’ morality and sense of security, Port and Kit’s marriage, and eventually Port and Kit’s physical and mental (respectively) health.

The group travels through various towns in Algeria, namely Boussif, Ain Krorfa, Bou Noura, Messad, El Ga’a, and Sba. Bowles was not exaggerating when he portrayed these small Saharan towns – I was unable to find much information on any of them. Needless to say, these small Algerian towns are not common American tourist destinations. Port addresses the towns’ isolation at the very beginning of the novel: he chooses to travel to Algeria instead of Italy (his wife’s desire) because he considers himself a true traveler, “belonging no more to one place than to the next, [moving] slowly, over periods of years, from one part of the earth to another…[he] compares [his own civilization] with the others, and rejects those elements he finds not to his liking” (6). Port’s preoccupation with traveling deeper and deeper into the desert is akin to his tendency to dig himself deeper and deeper into emotional darkness with his intellectual philosophies. He claims a desire to deepen his relationship with Kit but is not willing to sacrifice his own desires for sex and adventure in order to compromise with his wife.

While reading the novel, I periodically asked myself: what is Bowles saying about Algeria and, more generally, Africa? The novel’s protagonists often describe the Saharan towns as derelict, shabby, dirty, and dangerous. But before we assume that Bowles is intending to blame these emotions on Africa, let us take a deeper look at what Bowles believes about his characters. Although Kit and Port grow more and more sick and miserable over the course of the novel, they are not truly happy to begin with. We know that one of the main reasons for their traveling is to rekindle their love for each other as well as a sense of excitement based in adventure. Unfortunately, they do not succeed. However, Bowles provides an important lesson with their story: traveling will not content us. It is not solely the place to which one goes, but the attitude and behavior one brings along that determines one’s experience.

More than anything, The Sheltering Sky depicts the dissolution of two lives. Bowles uses the sparse landscape of the desert as a metaphor for the emptiness and misery of his protagonists. Although Kit and Port look judgmentally upon the Algerian natives, Bowles does not give these prejudices credence, as his protagonists themselves act completely immorally. As the characters travel into the heart of the desert, they lose their own hearts.

  • lemon-basil's blog

It's interesting the way you

Submitted by B. on Tue, 10/13/2009 - 19:50.

It's interesting the way you phrased that, as they "travel into the heart of the desert, they lose their own hearts", that sentence struck me as it confirmed a lot of what I was feeling as I read the book. I believe you draw the same conclusion by writing that sentence. This book was reminiscent of Heart of Darkness. The loss of morality, the judgement of locals, the hypocrisy of the traveler, all themes that run throughout both books. So I guess the result is the same as well, traveling did not bring the protagonists happiness in either novel, rather a whole other set of issues by which their life would be defined.

Contact * About Place Studies * RSS

Powered by Drupal * Site Map * Course Archive

User Agreement * Privacy * Comment Policy

Copyright © 2008 PlaceStudies.com


RoopleTheme