Place Studies

Suckerfish

  • Travel Studies
  • Classes
    • Art of Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • The Travel Habit
    • Archive
  • Studies Abroad
    • Berlin
    • Buenos Aires
    • Florence
    • Ghana
    • London
    • Madrid
    • Paris
    • Prague
    • Shanghai
    • Links & Other Sites
      • Study Abroad Resources
      • Brazil
      • Cuba
      • IHP: Tanzania-Vietnam
      • Venezuela
  • Research
  • A-V
    • A-V materials
    • Place TV
    • Node locations
    • Slideshows
  • Academics
    • Registration
    • Internships
    • Gallatin links
    • NYU Links
  • Life
    • Gallatin events
    • Announcements
    • Events Calendar
    • Places to go
  • News
    • Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • Travel in the Thirties
    • Travel Classics
    • Travel Literature
    • A Sense of Place
    • Maps
    • NYC
    • Noted New York
    • Noted News
    • Book News
    • Home
    • Search
    • Help
    • Log in

Blogs (Fall 2009)

  • All Blogs
  • Art of Travel
  • Travel Fictions
  • The Travel Habit

Recent Posts

Epiphany in Venice
The Real Lesson is in the Journey
Stranger Danger
The Other Side of the Ocean
Travel Experience and Epiphany

Recent Comments

Would you really want
Packing
I think there may be a logic
I agree with you. I think
i think i actually saw more
Looking back on our arrivals

Blogs

"If You Must Read This..."

Submitted by Isabel Archer on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 11:30
  • Travel Fictions
  • Heart of Darkness

Chinua AchebeChinua Achebe

In an interview by Robert Siegel on All Things Considered, Nigerian author Chinua Achebe discusses Conrad’s racist attitude towards the natives on his character Marlow’s journey up the Congo River. Achebe published his first book in 1958. Things Fall Apart “stood fiction writing about Africa on its head” because it told about the coming of the British to African as Africans experienced it.

Achebe said he grew up identifying with Marlow, but (Siegel reads a quote from a corresponding article Achebe wrote), “A time came when I reached the appropriate age and realized that these writers had pulled a fast one on me: I was not on Marlow’s boat steaming up the Congo in Heart of Darkness, rather, I was one of those unattractive beings jumping up and down on the riverbanks.” Achebe says that was when he realized “how terribly, terribly wrong it was to portray my people, any people, from that attitude, from that point of view.” In the article Achebe says others have argued that Conrad was not endorsing the view Marlow took of the natives, but instead he was “holding it up to irony and criticism.” Achebe defends his argument by saying that Conrad neglected to hint at any alternate frame of reference.

I agree with Achebe in his assessment of Conrad’s novella. “The point of my observations should be quite clear by now, namely, that Conrad was a bloody racist.” His descriptions of the natives withhold any sense of human expression, and establish the natives and the white men as having two opposing humanities. Africa as the setting dissociates the natives from any human factor. They are merely props. Achebe says that Heart of Darkness cannot be called a great work of art because it “celebrates this dehumanization,” and “depersonalizes a portion of the human race.”

  • Isabel Archer's blog

Historically, Achebe is right

Submitted by Sylvia Beach on Wed, 12/02/2009 - 14:17.

Historically, Achebe is right - Africans have not been given subjectivity in the large part of Western literature. But to defend Conrad, if he even needs defending, Heart of Darkness stands as an accurate portrayal of 19th century colonial attitudes. It would seem to have tremendous value as a historical chronicle of the particular psychic twist of colonial racism.

Contact * About Place Studies * RSS

Powered by Drupal * Site Map * Course Archive

User Agreement * Privacy * Comment Policy

Copyright © 2008 PlaceStudies.com


RoopleTheme