Blogs
Jerusalem: A Religious Microcosm?
The Dome of the RockTo refer to Ibn Battutah solely as a religious pilgrim completely sells short his travels and his legacy. As Tim Mackintosh-Smith, the editor of the 2003 edition of his Travels, reflects in his introductory foreword, Ibn Battutah was also a “hagiographer, ethnographer, biographer, anecdotal historian and occasional botanist and gastronome”. Indeed, by reading Battutah’s travelogue it is easy to agree with Mackintosh-Smith: the 29-year journey does not merely focus on our protagonist’s obligatory hajj to Mecca. Still, let’s look at Battutah’s travels through the lens of religion – it is almost impossible to ignore that particular angle. Venturing through the Holy Land, he continually finds himself at many of the most influential sites to the three major Western religions (Judaism, Islam, Christianity), and falls easily into the category of hagiographer and “anecdotal historian” simultaneously. We dove into the Travels knowing that Battutah was a Muslim pilgrim, and it is interesting to gauge his reaction to the holy sites of the Judeo-Christian faiths. These worlds collide when Battutah reaches Jerusalem, where Islamic monuments such as the Dome of the Rock lie minutes away from the rumored Hill of Calvary, the exact spot where Jesus was purportedly crucified and buried. While these monuments are still considered incredible feats of architecture today, imagine how overwhelmingly wondrous it must have been for a 14th-century traveler to lay their eyes on the Dome of the Rock, the Al-Aqsa mosque, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre! Battutah’s voyages would eventually take him all over southern Europe, where the Gothic movement was in full swing, and through China, where the ancient temples had stood for centuries. Still, seeing these particular “gracious sanctuaries” – especially those two incredibly holy places of Muslim worship – must have been absolutely superb given his clear allegiance to his faith. The influence of early Judeo-Christian architecture on that of the Muslim monuments is impossible to gloss over. The layout of the Dome of the Rock is unbelievably similar to that of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, constructed in the 4th century under the supervision of Emperor Constantine’s mother, who decreed the Hill the location of Christ’s Passion and burial. The Dome of the Rock is a second-degree adaptation of Roman art from the early Christian period – a grandiose style not typically seen in Battutah’s native lands. However, modifications on the theme obviously exist, tailoring the building style to the faith: in fact, the interior walls of the Dome of the Rock are inscribed with pleas asking the Muslims to reject the teachings of Christianity. The mélange of inspiration: spiritual, architectural, artistic – to be found in Jerusalem is truly fascinating. Speaking strictly on the subject of monuments, it is even more interesting to note their incredible similarities despite the vast differences in faith bases. In many respects, the amalgam of religious and social culture that Ibn Battutah found in Jerusalem can be considered a microcosm of the Western medieval world.


What is shared
You said in your post that you were struck by the similarities that the architecture of the holy christian and Muslim sites shared and how the religions converged in Jerusalem. That comment made me think of how the three major religions of the West are similar in ways other than architecture. The three religions Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, are all based on the same fundamental scriptures. The Torah (the Hebrew bible) is the old testament and the first half the standard full bible. This text (the first five books of the bible) and the scrolls of Abraham (the one who made the covenant with God, also the father of us all) and the psalms, are considered part of the Islamic scripture. Battutah gives the claim of the land to the Muslims in mentioning the dome of the rock which is a super holy Muslim and christian site, which sits on top of the holiest Jewish site (the kotel, western wall, wailing wall, call it what you will) which commemorates the site of the temples of Solomon. It's not that Battutah would have found the Jewish and Christian sites odd, because they are Muslim sites too. Think about it, the same holy sites, the same profits, the same monotheism, same basis for text for establishing religion and what ensues is unsolvable conflict over ownership. Blows my mind a little.
Where's the Jews
When I got to the Jerusalem section of Battutah’s narrative I was surprised to see no mention of Jewish people living in the city. I had known that there were periods of time where there was more of a Jewish presence in Jerusalem than others, but I was under the false impression that there was always some sort of significant Jewry in the Holy City. After quickly looking it up in Wikipedia I found that a little less then a century before Battutah passed through Jerusalem the Kharezmian Tartars had been in control of the city and had banished the Jews completely. After the Tartars were dethroned by the Mamluks, an Islamic group from Egypt, it was unclear from what I read whether the Jews were invited back into the city. It is quite possible that in Battutah’s time there really was not much of a Jewish presence in their Holy City.
It's easy to forget--as I
It's easy to forget--as I obviously did before being reminded by your post--that Ibn Battutah does a considerable amount of traveling in the area where the three major religions of his time and ours originated. His references to the Muslim religion are innumerable, but that doesn't mean it's the only religion present. Though he may degrade (?) non-Muslims by referring to them as infidels, it's important to note he mentions them at all.