Place Studies

Suckerfish

  • Travel Studies
  • Classes
    • Art of Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • The Travel Habit
    • Archive
  • Studies Abroad
    • Berlin
    • Buenos Aires
    • Florence
    • Ghana
    • London
    • Madrid
    • Paris
    • Prague
    • Shanghai
    • Links & Other Sites
      • Study Abroad Resources
      • Brazil
      • Cuba
      • IHP: Tanzania-Vietnam
      • Venezuela
  • Research
  • A-V
    • A-V materials
    • Place TV
    • Node locations
    • Slideshows
  • Academics
    • Registration
    • Internships
    • Gallatin links
    • NYU Links
  • Life
    • Gallatin events
    • Announcements
    • Events Calendar
    • Places to go
  • News
    • Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • Travel in the Thirties
    • Travel Classics
    • Travel Literature
    • A Sense of Place
    • Maps
    • NYC
    • Noted New York
    • Noted News
    • Book News
    • Home
    • Search
    • Help
    • Log in

Blogs (Fall 2009)

  • All Blogs
  • Art of Travel
  • Travel Fictions
  • The Travel Habit

Recent Posts

Epiphany in Venice
The Real Lesson is in the Journey
Stranger Danger
The Other Side of the Ocean
Travel Experience and Epiphany

Recent Comments

Would you really want
Packing
I think there may be a logic
I agree with you. I think
i think i actually saw more
Looking back on our arrivals

Blogs

Literary Compromises

Submitted by Stacy Wynn on Sun, 10/04/2009 - 21:35
  • Travel Fictions
  • Heart of Darkness

Blackwood's MagazineBlackwood's MagazineAfter reading an article by Tanya Gokulsing regarding the different components of Joseph Conrad’s novel, Heart of Darkness, one section really stood out to me. Gokulsing’s discussion about Conrad’s writing and its relation to Blackwood’s Magazine was both eye opening and intriguing. I find it very interesting that many elements of Conrad’s famous novella were created in order to appease the readers of the magazine in which it was first published. According to this article, Conrad consciously tried to shape his novella in a way that would not insult any of his readers. I find it remarkable that an author would put so much weight on the reviews of his readers rather than writing about his genuine ideals and opinions.

The article also asserts that many of Conrad’s choices were used in order to appeal to the “common” readers of Blackwood’s Magazine. I think that in the characters that Conrad created and the stylistic approach he chose he was definitely trying to make his story accessible to the target audience of the magazine. By making the novella a first person account of the events described the reader is more likely to have a personal connection to the story. Whether the reader was an imperialist or a die-hard anti-imperialist he was still able to connect to the events that took place.

In trying to make a name for himself in the literary world, Conrad made many smart writing decisions that possibly led to the great success of his novella. Conrad was careful in making the discussion of imperialism based on Belgium imperialism rather than that of Great Britain. This was a smart move because it left no room for speculation that Conrad was criticizing the nation that his key demographic resided in. Conrad protected himself from backlash by remaining somewhat neutral on this topic. He was effectively able to show the effects of imperialism without risking the loss of devoted readers.

In the end, it is important to remember that even the literary world is a business. Joseph Conrad made many decisions in his writing of Heart of Darkness in order to gain a respect among the readers of Blackwood’s Magazine. These decisions could have compromised his own beliefs but in the end they led to a successful and fascinating novella.

  • Stacy Wynn's blog

It's interesting to think

Submitted by B. on Mon, 10/05/2009 - 13:32.

It's interesting to think that this novel isn't supposed to offend anyone. I feel as though maybe he tried to appeal to everyone by offending everyone. To me, it seems as though there's a strong criticism of Imperialism, but at the same time, the way the "savages" were described is also offensive. While Conrad tries to give each group of people a "redeeming" quality, I still think it's offensive to all. Gokulsing tries to assert that Conrad might try to justify Imperialism because of the idea behind the madness is a positive one. Conrad also tries to impose this idea of maybe the supposed "savages" aren't the savage ones? But I still think the language is offensive to both groups, and maybe that's how he appeases his readers? By placing them on an equal playing field of feeling offended.

Contact * About Place Studies * RSS

Powered by Drupal * Site Map * Course Archive

User Agreement * Privacy * Comment Policy

Copyright © 2008 PlaceStudies.com


RoopleTheme