Place Studies

Suckerfish

  • Travel Studies
  • Classes
    • Art of Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • The Travel Habit
    • Archive
  • Studies Abroad
    • Berlin
    • Buenos Aires
    • Florence
    • Ghana
    • London
    • Madrid
    • Paris
    • Prague
    • Shanghai
    • Links & Other Sites
      • Study Abroad Resources
      • Brazil
      • Cuba
      • IHP: Tanzania-Vietnam
      • Venezuela
  • Research
  • A-V
    • A-V materials
    • Place TV
    • Node locations
    • Slideshows
  • Academics
    • Registration
    • Internships
    • Gallatin links
    • NYU Links
  • Life
    • Gallatin events
    • Announcements
    • Events Calendar
    • Places to go
  • News
    • Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • Travel in the Thirties
    • Travel Classics
    • Travel Literature
    • A Sense of Place
    • Maps
    • NYC
    • Noted New York
    • Noted News
    • Book News
    • Home
    • Search
    • Help
    • Log in

Blogs (Fall 2009)

  • All Blogs
  • Art of Travel
  • Travel Fictions
  • The Travel Habit

Recent Posts

Epiphany in Venice
The Real Lesson is in the Journey
Stranger Danger
The Other Side of the Ocean
Travel Experience and Epiphany

Recent Comments

Would you really want
Packing
I think there may be a logic
I agree with you. I think
i think i actually saw more
Looking back on our arrivals

Blogs

Pshoo

Submitted by paz_mp on Wed, 10/22/2008 - 00:54
  • boo generalize
  • Art of Travel
  • 8. Authenticity

matématéComparing the experiences I'm having now to past travel, I sort of see this whole semester as an effort to get into Goffman's "back region." In my mind, that has always been the point of study abroad--an opportunity to actually live in a place rather than just pass through it. Whether or not I'm achieving this now seems impossible to decipher, because I can only know so much and to such a degree. This issue of only knowing as much as you do seems problematic for MacCannel's argument. He definitely talks about it, but the undefinable nature of reality--back region or front--diminishes his main points (in my opinion). Even though I don't think these lines can be clear, there are certain marked experiences I've had which for one reason or another, seem genuinely "back region."

The most obvious example is my homestay, since I live with an Argentine woman who speaks no English. I know about her daily life, activities, diet, basically everything she does. This is undeniable "back region" in many senses, but then I come up with question like "is this experience normal?" "is she normal?" "are we eating the way natives eat?" And the answer to all of these is "yes," but it could also be "no" since there isn't a rule for "normal," or native diet, or any culture/place-specific aspect.

I realize I might be problematizing this more than I need to, and could continue forever. Nonetheless, there are some things which stand out which are more generally specific to people in Buenos Aires, including my hostmother. One example of this is yerba maté, which is a very strong type of tea made from coca leaves. Here they drink it all the time, out of a gourd or some similar type of cup, filled nearly all the way with the tea leaves. That's why it's so strong. They also use a decorative metal straw to drink it, and carry the whole kit around to parks, etc., with a thermos, to keep adding hot water. This is an activity which tourists can easily involve themselves in, which also exists in the back region; a part of daily life. While a tourist might try a maté in Argentina, most natives drink it often, and own all the necessary supplies.
Ohh, I meant to give an example of back region only, but here it is again; maté can fit in both perfectly. I think my small issues with this article have to do with the fact that I don't like generalizations. I know they're irresistible, but on this topic, I feel like tourist experiences with native customs are just too case-by-case. 

  • paz_mp's blog

Don't like generalizations?

Submitted by steve on Wed, 10/22/2008 - 13:54.

Don't like generalizations?  There go all the social sciences.  Making categories and forming generalizations are what they spend most of their time doing.  But actually, as interesting as I find an article like MacCannell's, I tend to agree with you, which is why I prefer the literary approach of a good travel writer.  They generalize too, but at least they're dealing with specific, concrete cases and experiences.  Of course, the sociologist is working from actual evidence too; it's just that his conclusions tend to get more attention that the data on which they're based, whereas in literary works like travel narratives, it's all about the "data."  Anyway, hearing about your experiences with mate reminds me of Che's Motorcycle Diaries, which was the first place I read about this stuff.  He drinks it all the time in the book. 

Contact * About Place Studies * RSS

Powered by Drupal * Site Map * Course Archive

User Agreement * Privacy * Comment Policy

Copyright © 2008 PlaceStudies.com


RoopleTheme