Place Studies

Suckerfish

  • Travel Studies
  • Classes
    • Art of Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • The Travel Habit
    • Archive
  • Studies Abroad
    • Berlin
    • Buenos Aires
    • Florence
    • Ghana
    • London
    • Madrid
    • Paris
    • Prague
    • Shanghai
    • Links & Other Sites
      • Study Abroad Resources
      • Brazil
      • Cuba
      • IHP: Tanzania-Vietnam
      • Venezuela
  • Research
  • A-V
    • A-V materials
    • Place TV
    • Node locations
    • Slideshows
  • Academics
    • Registration
    • Internships
    • Gallatin links
    • NYU Links
  • Life
    • Gallatin events
    • Announcements
    • Events Calendar
    • Places to go
  • News
    • Travel
    • Travel Fictions
    • Travel in the Thirties
    • Travel Classics
    • Travel Literature
    • A Sense of Place
    • Maps
    • NYC
    • Noted New York
    • Noted News
    • Book News
    • Home
    • Search
    • Help
    • Log in

Blogs (Fall 2009)

  • All Blogs
  • Art of Travel
  • Travel Fictions
  • The Travel Habit

Recent Posts

Epiphany in Venice
The Real Lesson is in the Journey
Stranger Danger
The Other Side of the Ocean
Travel Experience and Epiphany

Recent Comments

Would you really want
Packing
I think there may be a logic
I agree with you. I think
i think i actually saw more
Looking back on our arrivals

Blogs

Some travel habits

Submitted by eeen on Sat, 09/26/2009 - 13:18
  • The Travel Habit
  • Writers on the Road
  • Habit
  • vacation
  • vagrant
  • writer

We've read a lot of grim tales so far, to be sure, but one thing's been bugging me—not about the plight of the “chiselers” and “shovel-leaners” but about why this class is called “The Travel Habit” and not “The Great Depression”. While the down-and-out are certainly an important and relevant subject for discussion, as evidenced by the majority of posts on this blog to date, it could also be useful to address a different aspect of these writings, the actual travel aspect, and what it entails.

I was particularly taken by the selections from Ernie Pyle's Home Country, especially his ruminations on the unusual perspective of the country afforded by constant travel, and his description of the very real travel habit he and “that Girl” developed. What began as immediate shock at each barren, desolate, ruined field soon became a kind of numbness, an acceptance that everything everywhere in the “Drought Bowl” was, is, and will continue be so ruined. The much deeper shock came later, when Pyle realized how he, like the farmers who lived on the land, had so matter-of-factly resigned himself to this desolation, and the “stupendousness” of it all. Not living in one place for any period of time made his connection to individual places rather shallow, but the breadth of his experience was truly incredible, and showed him a “big picture” that was stunning in its magnitude.

Pyle developed a real habit out of travelling, as he describes in the last chapter, both making himself and his wife a family that lived and could rest anyplace and noplace. Any mode of living becomes habitual, solidifies certain aspects of itself into routine, and has its own advantages and disadvantages. For most people, tied to some degree to a particular place—land, a house, an apartment, a neighborhood—much of their perspective and understanding of the world comes from the habits that that place provides or requires of them, both enriching and enmeshing them in that place. Making a habit out of leaving such places severs such habits that are particular to a place, an instead pulls habits from the experience of moving through the open space between them: of leaving and arriving, of short encounters, maintenance and correspondence.

Woo! Vacation!Woo! Vacation!

To return to the down-and-out, many of those who lived a life of travel in the '30s did not do so out of choice or inclination, as did so many writers of the time, but out of desperation. They too developed a travel habit, but theirs was very different, generally far more difficult and at the mercy of chance, as described by Adamic in “The Girl on the Road”. The habit of the vagrant, though they travelled many of the same roads as the writers, did not offer some broad, stupendous picture of the country; they already had a perspective borne of hardship, deep and narrow and pertaining to themselves and their places and those they knew. Many people of the era traveled simply for tourism and sight-seeing and for them, the travel habit was part of living a stationary life, an occasional diversion, a way to appreciate what was at home and what was out there while maintaining a home to go back to, always. The perspective afforded by their travel habit remains a narrow one, deep only at home, vacation destinations serving to contrast or extend the home through shallow but delightful exoticism.

  • eeen's blog

indeed, I think you're right

Submitted by especes d-espaces on Sun, 09/27/2009 - 13:24.

indeed, I think you're right when you say that a certain class of the population had no choice but to leave and live through their "travel habit" but hasn't that been the case of certain people for ages? People have always been on the road, on the move, on the lookout for a better situation, no? And there have always been those who were able to travel for their leisure! Can we blame them for taking advantage of their opportunities? Or should we only blame them only for denigarating the other class? Obviously those who were able to make use of inventions such as the "electric razor" or also the "polaroid" weren't those who were searching for better living conditions...

well

Submitted by eeen on Mon, 09/28/2009 - 00:39.

I don't know the answer to most of those questions, especially about laying blame, but certainly migration borne of desperation can be found throughout human history—I suppose my point was just that from that perspective, the 1930s in the USA can be seen as a major shift in how many groups of people related to the land they lived on. This is not to say you couldn't find those relationships elsewhere, even within the country and before the '30s, but that the time period and the people we're reading about are interesting because their relationships to the land changed so drastically in that time.

 

(Also, that's an awesome site you linked to, though I don't know if they could have used a more awful background image)

yeah the background is...

Submitted by especes d-espaces on Mon, 09/28/2009 - 17:27.

yeah the background is... "ugh..." !

Contact * About Place Studies * RSS

Powered by Drupal * Site Map * Course Archive

User Agreement * Privacy * Comment Policy

Copyright © 2008 PlaceStudies.com


RoopleTheme